<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strategic investing: Value investing without the market timing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popeconomics.com/2010/05/05/strategic-investing-value-investing-without-the-market-timing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popeconomics.com/2010/05/05/strategic-investing-value-investing-without-the-market-timing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:01:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.popeconomics.com/2010/05/05/strategic-investing-value-investing-without-the-market-timing/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 00:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popeconomics.com/?p=1030#comment-356</guid>
		<description>When I read that you were talking about a strategy between passive and active investing, something else came to my mind.

I know a lot of hedge fund managers that try to track a specific index, for example the Dow 30, but will just underweight the companies that they think suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read that you were talking about a strategy between passive and active investing, something else came to my mind.</p>
<p>I know a lot of hedge fund managers that try to track a specific index, for example the Dow 30, but will just underweight the companies that they think suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.popeconomics.com/2010/05/05/strategic-investing-value-investing-without-the-market-timing/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 18:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popeconomics.com/?p=1030#comment-333</guid>
		<description>any idea if shiller is using  earnings numbers that include/exclude extraordinary items to calculate the ratio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any idea if shiller is using  earnings numbers that include/exclude extraordinary items to calculate the ratio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.popeconomics.com/2010/05/05/strategic-investing-value-investing-without-the-market-timing/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 14:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popeconomics.com/?p=1030#comment-319</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Kind of a cop out, you might argue. But hey, you didn’t expect me to reverse my position, did you?&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s a helpful, constructive, positive, life-affirming &quot;cop-out&quot;, in my assesssment. It gets people thinking about the right things.

I&#039;d like everyone to understand that I did not start out thinking that Buy-and-Hold was dangerous. Like most others, I presumed that it worked &lt;i&gt;just fine.&lt;/i&gt; A strange set of circumstances forced me to spend a lot of time studying the data. The more I studied it, the more amazed I was at how big a role valuations play in making long-term investing success possible or impossible.

There&#039;s room for lots of different viewpoints. I am today at one end of the spectrum of reasonable opinion. You are at a different place on the spectrum of reasonable opinion, Pop. Each person comes at these questions from a different set of life experiences that places him or her at a different spot along the spectrum.

The key is that we all just keep talking it over. That&#039;s how we all learn. That&#039;s how we all (including me!) advance in our understanding. Thanks for another thought-stimulating post.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Kind of a cop out, you might argue. But hey, you didn’t expect me to reverse my position, did you?</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a helpful, constructive, positive, life-affirming &#8220;cop-out&#8221;, in my assesssment. It gets people thinking about the right things.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like everyone to understand that I did not start out thinking that Buy-and-Hold was dangerous. Like most others, I presumed that it worked <i>just fine.</i> A strange set of circumstances forced me to spend a lot of time studying the data. The more I studied it, the more amazed I was at how big a role valuations play in making long-term investing success possible or impossible.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s room for lots of different viewpoints. I am today at one end of the spectrum of reasonable opinion. You are at a different place on the spectrum of reasonable opinion, Pop. Each person comes at these questions from a different set of life experiences that places him or her at a different spot along the spectrum.</p>
<p>The key is that we all just keep talking it over. That&#8217;s how we all learn. That&#8217;s how we all (including me!) advance in our understanding. Thanks for another thought-stimulating post.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

